100 Replies to “Alan Dershowitz on President Trump’s impeachment defense strategy, battle over witnesses”

  1. LMAO Chris is trying to argue with someone who knows Constitutional Law far better than Chris knows what color of socks he's wearing! What an IDIOT!

  2. Chris is a slimy Liberal creature……spawn of another slimy creature, Mike Wallace. May he be stepped on soon!

  3. I'm an attorney. Next time I have client who is charged and sent to trial I'm going to tell the judge that the prosecutors aren't allowed to call any witnesses who weren't interviewed as part of the investigation, even if they have evidence directly relevant to the trial. Let's see how far I get!

  4. Its funny that so MANY people have a problem w/ the "fair and balance" news channel having someone on that challenges the Republican narrative.

  5. It seems every time Alan has an undeniable answer to Chris's argument, he interrupts him and says he needs to move on due to time.

  6. I don't think Chris is defending the president, looks like he has already found the president guilty, he must be a Democrate  likes to hear his side of the news and the heck with every  body elses view.

  7. Watergate Wallace is the most distinguished lawyer in the universe who did not make it to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. So sad. LOL

  8. Chris Wallace is quite disrespectful in this exchange…Over-talking, ambushing etc. Thought he was better than that. Apparently not.

  9. That and the fact that the house has no authority on foreign affairs to even raise the question of impeachment. Domestic, yes. Foreign no. Foreign affairs and treaties are exclusively an executive branch function. The house has really put their foot in it this time.

  10. If you've got the power, is using it the same as abusing it? I guess the use of his power isn't the problem, just that they say he used it specifically for personal gain? Mind readers? And they just have to SAY you were thinking it. Jeez… How could this go wrong? To presume what someone else is thinking and then punish them accordingly. Now THAT sounds like an abuse of power.

  11. The Founding Fathers knew that one day gangs like the Democratic Party would try to overthrow the elected administration with vaguely worded accusations. They knew what Weasels were to come in the future. Power always corrupts, and only the Bill of Rights protects us against encroachments on Liberty by government bureaucrats. Great to see Dershowitz using his wits to defend the Constitution and the Republic.

  12. We VOTED TRUMP IN TO DO A JOB. WE GAVE HIM PERMISSION TO USE HIS ABILITIES, TO MANAGE AND GOVORN, WE ,,,MADE HIM OUR LEADER , " NOT SHIFF ,NANCY OR CHUCKY "HE SHOULD BE " ALLOWED TO DO THE JOB THAT THE " PEOPLE " VOTED HIM IN TO DO , THIS CONSTANT DISREGARD FOR FAIR PLAY AND OUTRIGHT TREASON HAS " DESTROYED ALL CREDIBILITY " for the DEMMO—CRITES,

  13. Chris Wallace, you played an audio of something that has not been proven to be the President talking. We watch this station because we can count on the facts being brought forward. As of last night, a/27/2020, the audio had not been verified.

  14. Never forget this is a Epstein Island perv and kiddie diddler. Look at all the thumbs down for those who haven't forgot.

  15. Great job Chris, these are the questions that need to be asked and great job Professor these are the kind of answered that need to be given.

  16. Alan Dershowitz vs Chris Wallace in a debate over Constitutionality. Hahaha…it's Conor McGregor vs Nancy Pelosi in the octagon.

  17. Chris, your Demonrat is showing and it isn't becoming at all. TRUMP ISN'T GUILTY OF ALL THE LIES THEY ARE TRYING TO PIN ON HIM. YOU SOUND MORE AND MORE LIKE THE TREASONOUS CORRUPT SEDITIOUS CONSPIRATORS TRYING TO FRAME TRUMP. YOU BELONG ON CNN, MSNBC, OR THE DEEP STATE RAGS.

  18. Let's for one moment say Dershowitz's argument is valid, can the Senate find against Trump and remove him from office for any grounds other than those included in the articles? Second question, if he's right, why aren't the articles returned to the House to revise into an impeachable offence or discard? You don't release a murderer because the lawyer for the prosecution gets the wording wrong on the charge sheet. You query it and get it corrected, and the trial continues. The USA is holding this trial because the impeachment and the related articles are accepted as valid by everyone involved. Even though Republicans are making noise to the contrary, their actions show they recognize there is a case to answer and the impeachment is valid. As this interview highlights, some politicians and academics on both sides change their argument according to whom has been impeached rather than on the basis of truth. Patriotic Senators will like patriotic Americans generally want to seek out the truth, and the only way to do that is to call first hand witnesses and to get access to relevant documents.

  19. This is the same guy who said trump was corrupt and that he was gonna continue to act in the same manner as when he had trump university

  20. Wallace is a prick but at least FOX has an alternative perspective compared to CNN, which is a soviet style, Bolshevik propaganda!

  21. You have two people in front of you One who teaches the law in schools to all our lawyers as a professor and the other man reads the script of the left wing party and when the professor tries to speak he tries to cut him off because he doesn’t want to hear the truth who are you going to believe Chris Wallace is a political hack he cuts people off & don’t let them speak When he doesn’t like what they have to say and that’s why I don’t listen to him because I don’t like what he has to say And he is not an impartial
    Journalist

  22. They love acting like Trump likes firing people for disloyalties and because they disagree with him . When in fact he is one of the least likely presidents in history to fire anyone . He has proven that. Mark my words that will be his down fall , not getting shed of these dirt bags in the bureaucracy

  23. Oh yes, Chris Wallace….. go ahead and continue looking like a complete buffoon by trying to argue constitutional law with one of the best constitutional law professors in the country.

  24. Chris Wallace is a goose with a peanut brain and I mean that as a compliment. Funny how he is always running out of time and uses that as an excuse to cut off guests when he doesn’t like their response. I like watching Fox as it is balanced so much more than the fake news media is but all their interviewers have the same rushed approach to only hear what they want to hear.

  25. People are getting upset because Chris isnt following the Fox News rules and talking points. I'm sure they will be getting him out of there too. He's too much of an actual reporter asking difficult questions.

  26. Dershowitz finds it important to argue quid pro quo is not impeachable but Trump has stated repeatedly there was none. So which is it???????? Oh wait, the simplest answer is that it's a lie followed by an excuse for it. Childish excuses and redirection to follow in comments in 3………2………….1.

  27. Is Chris Wallace a Democrat proxy? Another red herring like Bolton? Abrasive and acting as an apologist for hearsay…

  28. Mr. Dershowitz, you done an immaculate defending Trump in the Senate!!. Very few could top that. LONG LIVE MR. DERSHOWITZ.

  29. This whole Trump thing seems familiar: One side is horrified, incensed and righteously offended by repeated perceived offenses. The other side skillfully defends the practice and manages to work through the conflict for the moment using the lawyer approach. It worked in Dred Scott; Plessy v. Ferguson; and might yet work to save Harvey Weinstein. The fact that Dershowitz is convincing viewers with legal details ought to worry folks. For a fee, he'd argue just as skillfully against any gun ownership or even for the legalization of cannibalism.

  30. REPUBLICANS LOVE SEXUAL PREDATORS! NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY TRUMP AND EPSTEIN CHOSE DERSHOWITZ 😂😂😂😂 🌲🇺🇸MERRY IMPEACHMAS TO ALL MAGAFILTH / NEVER FORGET🌲🇺🇸

  31. Chris Wallace really sounds and looks so arrogant. To think that he can know more about the constitution than THE Alan Dershowitz! Chris, stop pretending and just move to CNN or the other biased liberal fake media!

  32. “If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.”
    Alan Dershowitz

    Eerily similar to: “When the president does it,” President Nixon told interviewer, David Frost, “that means that it is not illegal.”

    It was wrong in the '70's and it's wrong now. Wow, just wow. Alan is making top dollar for this…we know he doesn't actually believe what he is saying right?

  33. Chris should learn the legality and the constitution as he is twisting things to try make democrats feel good 😂

  34. Wow, this interview is amazing. Dershowitz is well versed in constitutional law and framers intent and he demonstrates it with ready references to articles and historical facts. Wallace doesn’t have a chance.

  35. Just pointing out that, by Dershowitz's logic, placing heavily-armed police and military at every polling station with explicit orders to make sure everyone votes for Trump wouldn't be an impeachable offense.

  36. Dershowitz. Where did you study ? Russia ? Do we the people not have the right to hear the truth , witness statements right from the horse's mouth ? To see evidence ?
    Is this how courts trials will be carried out in the future ? Without evidence, without facts without the possibility of exposing the truth ?
    That means someone falsely accused of a crime could be tried without a chance to prove his or her innocence.

  37. Dershowitz just got paid some big $$$ bucks for trying to convince us of false rules.
    He himself got paid big $$$ bucks for saying the opposite in the Clinton trial.
    Money determines the "now" truth .

  38. Why in the world does Wallace ask a question and then interrupt his guest before he can answer that question? Man alive, it's frustrating to listen to.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *