Russia VS United States (USA) – Who Would Win – Military Comparison 2019


Despite the chummy personal relations between
Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, tensions
between the two nations have reached their
highest point since the end of the Cold War.
Russia’s illegal annexation of the Crimea
has earned it international condemnation,
and its threats in recent years to use nuclear
weapons against Baltic state capitals has
only served to strengthen NATO’s resolve to
resist any possible Russian aggression.
Russia for its part has seen the expansion
of NATO as a form of aggression against itself,
and fears being boxed in even as it attempts
to resurrect the power it once held over east
Europe during the height of the Soviet Union.
Yet eastern european nations have largely
been adamant about their refusal to allow
the Kremlin into their backyard once more,
and have increasingly turned to NATO for security
assurances.
With the war in Syria opening up a new and
ongoing front between east and west, the possibility
of conflict between the US and Russia has
once more skyrocketed.
Hello and welcome to another episode of The
Infographics Show- today we’re doing our annual
comparison of the two nation’s militaries
in our Russian and American military comparison:
2019.
In recent years Russia has found itself increasingly
maligned by the international community.
Their annexation of Crimea in 2014 immediately
ratcheted tensions between the US and itself
even after years of slowly warming relations
and cooperation between the two states.
When NATO responded by forming forward-based
rapid response forces close to Russia’s borders,
Russia privately warned the United States
that it would not hesitate to use tactical
nuclear weapons against NATO troops in the
Baltics.
Not one to be easily intimidated, President
Obama at the time responded by sending American
forces on permanent rotation to the Baltics,
determined to uphold America’s commitment
to its NATO allies despite the nuclear threats.
The attempted coup against the Montenegro
government by Russian agents just prior to
its joining NATO only served to further inflame
tensions between east and west.
Russia’s actions have also earned it severe
sanctions from the West, which have caused
deep economic harm to the increasingly isolated
nation.
Currently under a multi-year rearmament plan,
the sanctions have severely limited the scope
of the planned rearmament of the Russian military,
specially hurting its ability to upgrade aging
tanks, planes, and other high technology assets.
In the face of international sanctions though,
the Russian defense industry has expanded
impressively, rising to meet the needs of
Russia’s bid to modernize its military forces.
Even with an expanded domestic defense industry
however, Russia is still struggling to meet
the ambitious goals of its rearmament plans,
and it has had to abandon altogether some
of its most desperately needed and high profile
weapons programs such as the SU-57 fighter,
who’s acquisition has been indefinitely postponed.
Originally claiming that Russia had no need
for a 5th generation fighter as its current
air fleets were more than capable of meeting
any possible opponents, the statement has
been widely derided as an attempt to save
face as Russia faces the fact that it simply
cannot afford the expensive fighter jet in
any meaningful numbers.
As of 2019, the SU-57’s planned acquisition
continued to be indefinitely postponed, but
with the guarantee that no major purchases
will take place before 2020 at a minimum.
This is bad news for the Russian military
as its 4th generation fighters, while extremely
capable for the most part, are now threatened
by expanding numbers of American made F-35s
and a formidable fleet of F-22s.
Yet where Russia has fallen behind in the
air, it has maintained its historical advantage
in ground-based anti-air capabilities with
the S-400 and S-500 missile system, widely
considered best in the world.
A new family of very long range missiles can
now target aircraft as far away as 250 miles
(400 km), and the new 9M96E2 missile can intercept
even very low flying cruise missiles.
Newly updated acquistion radars also give
the S-400 and S-500 the ability to track and
target stealth aircraft such as the F-35 at
any angle but head-on, which is where the
F-35 stealth’s features best protect the aircraft.
Operating dense nets of anti-air systems to
make up for its significantly weaker air force,
Russia continues to guarantee that any American
air operations against it will come with a
very high price that the US may not be willing
to pay.
On the ground, a new family of electronic
warfare vehicles also continues to give Russia
its historical advantage in electronic warfare,
and having carefully studied America’s use
of unmanned aerial vehicles, Russia has invested
heavily into disrupting drone platforms.
Keenly aware of the lethality of American
long-range standoff attack munitions, Russia
has also heavily invested into systems to
disrupt the guidance and targeting abilities
of cruise missile and other smart weapons.
While Russia’s current military strategy is
not to outright defeat America in battle,
but rather to ensure that any American action
against it is too painful to continue for
long, the US has for the first time in two
decades fully shifted its focus from global
terrorism operations to combating major regional
competitors.
For nearly twenty years the hulking American
war machine has been increasingly streamlined
for smaller scale global conflicts against
rogue nations or terrorist threats.
This has placed an emphasis on mobility, surveillance,
and long-range attack capabilities, which
makes the US military of today a highly agile,
intelligent, and lethal force- against anything
but major peer competitors such as Russia
and China.
The emphasis on fighting low intensity conflicts
and rapid response has seen America’s traditional
overwhelming advantage in high-intensity warfare
erode.
Plans for new self-propelled heavy artillery
pieces, a new battle tank, and some of the
most ambitious parts of the Future Soldier
program were all canceled in preference for
information technology upgrades, aerial surveillance
systems, and long-range attack capabilities.
While these all continue to make America a
deadly military force, a lack of investment
in new ground attack aircraft, main battle
tanks, and other frontline, high intensity
combat systems have given nations such as
Russia and China time to catch up.
Further, the US military has woefully lagged
behind in its electronic warfare capabilities
versus peer competitors, with its own capabilities
far behind Russia’s own.
This places all of the US’s high tech weapon
systems at severe jeopardy in the case of
war, though in 2018 a new focus on electronic
warfare has seen billions of investment from
the Pentagon.
Any new technologies and weapon systems though
will not be operational for years, perhaps
even a decade, leaving the US in a serious
lurch in case of war in the near future.
While the capabilities of nations such as
Russia and China are not significant enough
to completely eliminate the capabilities of
American high tech systems, they are sufficient
to prohibit a decisive and overwhelming victory,
and perhaps enough to threaten the US’s stated
military objectives of being able to fight
and win two simultaneous high intensity wars
anywhere in the world.
It is not all doom and gloom for the US however,
as the F-35 is finally reaching operational
capabilities in significant numbers.
A much maligned aircraft, the F-35 still manages
to achieve impressive kill ratios against
American and other allied aircraft in exercises.
The only times that F-35s are matched by 4th
generation aircraft are when they are forced
to enter into a combat exercise under extremely
unfavorable conditions, such as combat engagements
within just tens of miles.
As a stealthy platform, the F-35 is not designed
to ever get into close range against enemy
fighters, and instead use its overwhelming
technological advantages, and those of allied
platforms it is linked up to, to track and
destroy enemy aircraft from well beyond visual
range and before they have a chance to respond.
What many critics have failed to grasp is
that modern air war has moved well past the
dogfighting stage, and modern jet aircraft
are more accurately missile tugs than air-to-air
fighters, with the real combat done between
opposing missiles.
Yet America’s high tech systems are increasingly
vulnerable to electronic attack, an area which
as we mentioned before the US is lagging behind
Russia in.
A multi-billion dollar expansion of the US
defense budget by President Trump though has
seen a revitalization of the US military.
While in no way “depleted” as so confusingly
claimed by President Trump, the influx of
cash has guaranteed the continued acquisition
of Ford Class carriers as well as a planned
naval expansion of 46 ships in five years,
up to a planned 355 ships by 2050.
The new ship acquisitions will feature accelerated
purchases of Virginia class submarines, second
only to the US’s Seawolf class, as well as
a huge expansion of smaller, unmanned surface
drones for everything from surveillance and
intelligence gathering to submarine hunting.
Still, even with a new influx of cash, the
forced retirement of Los Angeles class submarines
will see the US Navy’s requirement of 66 attack
submarines not reached until 2048.
So just how do the two nations match up numerically
today?
Let’s take a look at the numbers.
The US military’s budget is 610 billion versus
just 66.3 billion for Russia, yet while the
US’s budget completely dwarfs Russia’s own,
the US military also has a great number of
international obligations to meet and pay
for in the name of global stability, while
Russia does not.
Currently the US has an active personnel force
of 1,281,900, versus Russia’s 771,000, yet
the US maintains 811,000 reservists versus
Russia’s 2,000,000.
In case of war, Russia would be able to equalize,
and even exceed troop strength faster than
the US.
However the US’s much larger population that
is available for military conscription- 73,270,043
versus Russia’s 34,765,736, means that in
the end the US would win the numbers game.
With Russian forces being approximately 2/3rds
conscripts, and not professional volunteer
soldiers such as the entirety of the US’s
own force, an initial numerological advantage
in the first year of a war would be seriously
eroded by training and morale issues amongst
Russian troops.
On the ground, the US fields 6,393 battle
tanks versus Russia’s 20,050.
While it may seem like Russia has an overwhelming
advantage here, it’s important to note that
only about 4,000 of these tanks are not even
remotely modern.
While Russian tank forces are a hodgepodge
of T-72s, T-80s, T-90s and much older, Cold
War era models, the entirety of the US tank
force are relatively modern Abrams, with over
1500 being state-of-the-art M1A2 models with
an annual upgrade program of about 100 M1s
to M1A2s.
Russia’s most modern tank, the T-90, only
numbers at about 550, and while a very lethal
modern platform with impressive offensive
capabilities, weighs roughly half as much
and is vastly outclassed defensively by the
Abrams.
The T-90 best represents Russia’s current
military budget realities, which force it
to develop weapons which excel offensively
while very often trading off defensive capabilities.
Lastly, the vast majority of Russia’s claimed
20,000 + tank force is not just antiquated,
but currently mothballed, and would take months
to refurbish and prepare for combat.
In the air the US has a fleet of 12,304 aircraft
versus Russia’s 4,441.
While Russia maintains a larger fighter force
of 751 versus the US’s 457, the US’s overwhelming
number of multirole platforms- 2191 vs 526-
give the US not just the numerological advantage,
but a degree of flexibility that Russia can’t
match.
Both nations field very capable and modern
fighters, though the US’s emphasis on stealth
technology highly favors a first-look, first-kill
capability.
However in case of war the lack of infrared
search and track and cheek-mounted radars
on some US aircraft- such as the F-22- and
the low missile capability of both the F-22
and the F-35, would leave many engagements
between US and Russian air forces in question.
While US planes would achieve many long-range
kills before Russian planes could effectively
respond, Russian Su-27s and Mig-31s would
exact a heavy toll on any incursions into
Russian territory.
American stealth planes such as the F-35 and
F-22 are simply not fielded in large enough
numbers yet to completely dominate the air
space over a battlefield, yet the overwhelming
advantage in numbers by the US would make
eventual air supremacy a forgone conclusion.
At sea the US navy fields 20 aircraft carriers
versus Russia’s 1, 85 destroyers versus Russia’s
18, and 71 submarines versus Russia’s 59.
Overwhelmingly modern platforms, the US navy
is numerologically and technologically superior
to Russia’s, which still struggles to keep
cold war era ships in fighting shape.
With no planned expansions to its navy, Russia
is set to continue to remain hopelessly outclassed
at sea- and yet Russia military doctrine always
placed a strong emphasis on fighting under
a Fortress Fleet doctrine, with its navy mostly
geared at preventing major landings behind
the front lines in Europe and operating under
air and fire support from land-based forces.
Russia has never, and continues to not plan
to challenge the US at sea, and thus is only
focused on making sure the American navy has
great difficulties operating close to Russian
shores.
2019 is seeing both nations expand their military
capabilities after years of slow, incremental
growth.
Unfortunately Russia’s economic condition
leaves it unable to make significant improvements
where it needs them the most- namely a 5th-generation
aircraft, major logistical and information
technology upgrades, and establishing an all-volunteer
military force.
The US on the other hand is greatly expanding
its military budget, even as its citizens
question the need for doing so in the first
place.
Russia and China may indeed be peer competitors,
but many argue that any potential aggression
by either nation should be met with a strong
system of international allies rather than
blunt military force, which only encourages
an even greater arms buildup.
Sadly, President Trump’s dismissal of long-time
traditional allies may indeed see the US’s
carefully cultivated system of international
alliances, groomed for decades after World
War II, begin to fall apart, leaving the US
standing alone while pushing its old allies
into the arms of its rivals.
Who do you think would win in a war between
the US and Russia?
Let us know in the comments!
Also, make sure you check out our other video,
Could USA Invade Mexico!
And as always if you enjoyed this video don’t
forget to Like, Share, and Subscribe!
See you next time!

100 Replies to “Russia VS United States (USA) – Who Would Win – Military Comparison 2019”

  1. Lol now buased bs. There's almost 1000 t90s. T90 has absolutely the best soft and active defences.
    Russia is the only other nation that can sink largest fleets with in hours. Also the only nation over which no air superiority can be claimed.

  2. For now it will be no major war like ww3 or what ever, probably for another like 20 years +, but for now proxy wars will be more common thinks between big nations on somebody else soil.
    But who would win USA or Russia? The winner will be Aliens at Area 51

  3. Americans second amendment is still gonna take the dub once again “ a well regulated militia is necessary to keep a free state/country”-tho as Jefferson

  4. Ха клёвый канал у нас такой же называется "что если?"ну почти

  5. Who would win:
    Russian bears trained in unicycle combat? OR The American Chicago Bears?
    Bears of Duty: Modern Bearfare

  6. The United States would win. The only way the US would lose is if Russia decided to use nukes forcing the US to do the same then it's game over for everyone. So the US has a chance of winning. While Russia has none. They cannot but can decide not to go down alone.

  7. Russia knows that they will never win a war against the USA unless they us nuclear weapons and that why I hope the USA is investing on a nuclear program to disappear any country from the earth

  8. too busy giving all our tax dollars to other countries for "stability", we spend 10x more than Russia and are behind on technology. This government is trash

  9. I been noticing more and more your cheap shots at trump and your political views being shown in videos . Stop it . Stop alienating half your fans it's not cool. I can tell you are a non trump supporter but does mean You have to alienate half your fans like me who support him

  10. Why should Russia and the United States fight if the volcano Yellowstone soon solves the whole problem? I hope.

  11. Ya all think the nukes are bad…ITS THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONRY THEY BOTH GOT THAT COULD WIPE ALL MICROBES OFF THE PLANET

  12. Americans dont want a war with russia it would be hard long and end either in stalemate or pyrrich victory and I'm fairly certain that Russians don't want war either

  13. If USA would fight Russia, they won't use nuclear weapons unless Russia use them first. So this war will be conventional with USA as winner

  14. The '' MAD " treaty holds both super powers. But, if ask me , in my honest opinion , Russia will annihilate what ever nation dares to attack him.

  15. It would escalate to nuclear exchange and nobody wins nuclear war. It is MAD. Russia might have less irradiated wasteland than US, but it is not a victory.

  16. No one wants to see an all out battle between these two countries but, frankly, United States has far too much military might for Russia to take. Putin knows this so he resorts to fighting us through trying to manipulate our democracy.

  17. I wish you could find a way to leave the left leaning politics out of this. You start this episode by stating Trump and Putin have a cozy relationship yet relations between their respective nations are at an all time modern low. Of course what you don't say is that a big reason for this is the new Trump-imposed sanctions on Russia which is in addition to what President Obama did during his tenure. You then state Trump is essentially pushing allies back towards Russia. Asking for several countries of NATO to pay towards their own defense is not audacious by any means. The left has always been about "paying your fair share" but I guess that doesn't apply here??? C'mon man.

    P.S. Hardy, burrowing insects are the big winners of WW3.

  18. I think The us would do something like beat Russia in everything but then Russia would use nuclear missiles to destroy everything.

  19. USA couldn't even conquer Vietnam and Russia couldn't conquer Afghanistan. Massive armies dont really mean anything.

  20. Wait this isnt about the russia vs usa bet if russia atack lith amercia will atack russia bc lith are friends with amercia so heres dat XD

  21. they both flopped against the Taliban, so it will be a war for 2nd&3rd place,now we know the Taliban are the top dawg

  22. Take away nuclear options, the US would win obviously. The US has more allies and bases around the world. And more military power.

    But the nuclear option, makes a war unwinnable for either side. So who wins? Nobody wins. Which is why there hasn't been a war yet.

  23. You forgot to add unmanned aircraft of US can along with satellite data, detect and destroy Russian anti aircraft missiles.

    The US had unmanned aircraft that can't be hacked. Because they are not remote controlled, rather have locations downloaded into it and then locked from having any interference, even from America. Specifically for this purpose of making Russia react to them with missiles.

  24. What I think is funny is before President Trump was elected liberals were saying that we are gonna go to war with Russia and start WW3 but then when both President Trump and President Putin want peace and no war and no nuclear war then the liberals say Trump is a traitor and siding with then enemy.. lol I support Trump all day.

  25. Texas owns more tigers in there state then there are in the world. I’m sorry Russia but cowboys riding tigers with machine guns? It was over before y’all knew it…

  26. Russia already won by putting a manchurian candidate in the white house. nobody benefits from the actual attitude of Prs. Trump towards NATO but Putin and Russia.

  27. You say Obama is not easily intimidated then why did he let Syria happen which is currently leading to the end of Europe?

  28. Tell the truth Donald Trump said it everybody speaks Russian there so it's part of Russia don't lie didn't Annex it illegally

  29. Russia is a bluff. The U.S. would smoke them. The U.S. economy is what will win a war. Besides, Russians have little to fight for from what I'm told.

  30. Let’s just hope a war with Russia and USA will be conventional warfare. But it will most likely be nuclear warfare

  31. This is exactly what they want you to think. Youre not mentioning the tech that cant be detected. And the aircraft that are actually ….spacecraft 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *