Steve Says: Breaking down whistleblower complaint, impeachment process


COMPREHENSIVE IMPEACHMENT COVERAGE YOU WILL FIND ANYWHERE. TO MAKE SENSE OF IT ALL I’LL BE JOINED BY A FANTASTIC LINEUP MARSHA BLACKBURN, JASON CHASE OATES AND KENNEDY. THE CONSTITUTION GIVES CONGRESS THE POWER TO REMOVE A PRESIDENT BEFORE THEIR TERM IS UP. THEY SAID HE COMMITTED TREASON, BRIBERY OR OTHER HIGH CRIMES OF MISDEMEANOR. IT STARTS WITH AN INVESTIGATION, HEARING AND THE VOTE IS TAKEN. IF THE MAJORITY OF THE HOUSE AGREES TO RESOLUTION CALLED ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT THE PRESIDENT IS TECHNICALLY IMPEACHED, SOMETHING THAT HAS HAPPENED TO TWO PRESIDENTS. JOHNSON AND BILL CLINTON. BUT, BEING IMPEACHED DOESN’T MEAN THE PRESIDENT IS IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM OFFICE. THINK OF IT AS AN INDICTMENT. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT IS THE TRIAL. THAT TAKES PLACE IN THE SENATE PRESIDED BY CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT. THE HOUSE MANAGES TO MAKE HIS CASE AND THE PRESIDENT HAS A LEGAL TEAM TO MAKE HIS. THE SENATE VOTES AND NEEDS A TWO THIRDS MAJORITY TO CONVICT AND REMOVE THE PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE. WE WILL GET TO THAT LATER WITH SENATOR BLACKBURN, ONE OF THE HUNDRED PEOPLE ON THE STREET. JUST TO BE CLEAR THERE ARE CURRENTLY 47 SENATE DEMOCRATS THAT WOULD TAKE AT LEAST 20 REPUBLICAN VOTES TO REMOVE THE PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE. OKAY. THAT’S THE OFFICIAL PROCESS. BUT WHAT IS ALL THIS REALLY ABOUT? THERE IS A MILE ANGELOU QUOTE MY ANGELO QUOTE. WHEN SOMEONE SHOWS YOU WHO THEY ARE, BELIEVE THEM THE FIRST TIME. ALL RIGHT THEN,.>>IMPEACHED 45 IF YOU’RE ASKING IF I WOULD VOTE TO IMPEACH THIS PRESIDENT, THE ANSWER IS YES.>>I SAY IMPEACHMENT, IMPEACHMENT, IMPEACHMENT.>>WORKING TO GO IN THERE. [INAUDIBLE]>>THEY BEEN WANTING TO IMPEACH TRUMP FROM PRACTICALLY THE MOMENT HE WAS ELECTED. ON TUESDAY AFTERNOON NANCY PELOSI JUMPED ON THE BANDWAGON TO TRY TO BRING SOME CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY BUT SHE LET SLIP THE REAL MOTIVATION EARLIER THAT DAY.>>WHAT’S MORE SERIOUS IS THAT HE CAN’T WIN. THERE YOU HAVE IT, THE MOST SERIOUS THING IS STOPPING DONALD TRUMP. IT’S NOT ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION IT’S ABOUT RETRIBUTION. THEY HATE HIM AND CAN’T BELIEVE HE ONE AND THEY ARE WORRIED HE WILL WIN AGAIN. THEY LECTURE US BUT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO WANT TO USE NONDEMOCRATIC MEANS TO GET RID OF THE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT. THIS UKRAINE STORY IS JUST THE LATEST PRETEXT. FIRST IT WAS COLLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION AND WHEN THAT DIDN’T WORK THEY GAVE UP FOR A FEW WEEKS. OH NO, THEY THOUGHT WE MIGHT HAVE TO TRY TO BEAT HIM IN AN ACTUAL ELECTION, BUT THEN, JUST IN THE NICK OF TIME A WHISTLEBLOWER CAME ALONG AND BOY WERE THEY EXCITED. JACKIE SPEAR LAST WEEK, SHE’S ON THE IMPEACHMENT COMMITTEE.>>FRANKLY, THIS TURNED OUT TO BE A GIFT BECAUSE IT IS SO CLEAR, SO BLATANT AND SO CORRUPT.>>A GIFT. SO MUCH FOR NANCY PELOSI’S BS ABOUT HOW SAD THIS ALL IS. NOW, ABOUT THAT WHISTLEBLOWER WHO GAVE THE DEMOCRATS THEIR GIFT, THE NEW YORK TIMES REPORTED LAST WEEK THAT HE IS A CIA BUREAUCRAT. LET ME REMIND YOU OF ANOTHER ANONYMOUS BUREAUCRAT WHO MADE A SPLASH ABOUT A YEAR AGO. WE KNOW BECAUSE THEY TOLD US THAT THERE’S AN ORGANIZED GROUP OF UNELECTED OFFICIALS ACTIVELY PLOTTING AGAINST THE ELECTED PRESIDENT THERE SUPPOSED TO SERVE. WE ALSO KNOW THIS LATEST ATTEMPT TO OVERTURN THE 2016 ELECTION WAS PUT INTO MOTION TO THE DEMOCRATS WERE GIVING UP ON THE MUELLER REPORT AS A BASIS FOR IMPEACHMENT AND ACCORDING TO AN INDEPENDENT JUSTICE DEPARTMENT MEMO THIS WHISTLEBLOWER IS AN ANTI- TRUMP PART IS ON. HIS DEFENDANTS I TRUST HIM BECAUSE HE FOLLOWED THE PROCESS, BUT THAT’S NOT TRUE, HE FOLLOWED THE RIGHT PROCESS UNTIL HIS CLAIM WAS REJECTED. THEN IT LEAKED TO THE PRESS. READ THE DOCUMENT HE WROTE. HE COMES ACROSS AS WHAT HE IS, A POMPOUS, ARROGANT BUREAUCRAT WHO IS HORRIFIED BY THE IDEA THAT A POLITICAL OUTSIDER COULD BARGE INTO HIS COZY RULING ELITE SNOOTY ESTABLISHMENT AND SAY IT’S OUTRAGEOUS TO DISPARAGE THIS PERSON. THAT WOULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED UNDER OBAMA. CAN YOU IMAGINE? WELL YES, IF YOUR NAME IS EDWARD SNOWDEN. WHEN A WHISTLEBLOWER EMBARRASSES OBAMA HE’S VILIFIED BUT IF HE HELPS THEM GET TRUMP, HE’S. [INAUDIBLE] WHAT HYPOCRITES. ANY JOURNALIST WHO UNCRITICALLY ACCEPTS THE CLAIMS OF THIS WHISTLEBLOWER IS ALLOWING THEIR CONTEMPT FOR TRUMP TO DESTROY THEIR JUDGMENT. NOW, WHAT ABOUT THE ALLEGED WRONGDOING, THE MOST SERIOUS CLAIM IS THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP WITHHELD U.S. MILITARY AID AS A QUID PRO QUO FOR UKRAINE TO INVESTIGATE JOE BIDEN. THE MEDIA HAS PUT OUT WHAT THEY CALL A DAMNING TIMELINE. THE CALL WITH THE UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT HAPPENED JULY 25. ON AUGUST 12, THE WHISTLEBLOWER FILED THEIR COMPLAINT. AT THE END OF AUGUST, PRESIDENT TRUMP EFFECTIVELY PUT A HOLD ON MILITARY AID MONEY. ON SEPTEMBER 1 THE VP MET WITH THE UKRAINIAN LEADER. EIGHT DAYS LATER, HOUSE COMMITTEES STARTED INVESTIGATING AND BY SEPTEMBER 12, RIGHT AFTER ADAM SCHIFF STARTED TO ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT THE COMPLAINTS, THE AID WAS LIFTED.>>THERE CLAIMING TRUMP ONLY RELEASE THE AID ONCE HE KNEW CONGRESS WAS INVESTIGATING. THERE’S JUST ONE PROBLEM WITH THAT TIMELINE. IT LEAVES OUT TWO CRUCIAL FACTS AND ONE CRUCIAL STEP. FIRST FACT, EVERYONE KNOWS TRUMP IS AN AIDE SKEPTIC. HOLDING UP AID TO UKRAINE IS TOTALLY CONSISTENT TO HIS POLICY POSITION WITH WHAT HE SAID REPEATEDLY TO OTHER WORLD LEADERS AND TO THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE ON THAT NOW FAMOUS PHONE CALL. SECOND FACT AS KEN REPORTED, UKRAINE DIDN’T EVEN KNOW THE AID WAS BEING HELD UP UNTIL A MONTH AFTER THAT CALL. HOW ON EARTH COULD YOU HAVE A QUID PRO QUO WHEN ONE SIDE DOESN’T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT. HERE’S HOW PRESIDENT TRUMP EXPLAINED.>>CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY AID TO UKRAINE WAS STOPPED.>>BECAUSE I THINK ANOTHER COUNTRY SHOULD BE PAYING. WHY IS THE UNITED STATES THE ONLY ONE PAYING TO UKRAINE I SAID HOLD IT UP AND LET’S GET OTHER PEOPLE TO PAY.>>AND NOW WE HAVE CORROBORATION IN THE FORM OF SENATOR ROB PORTMAN.>>I CALLED THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE WE WERE GETTING TO THE POINT WHERE THE FUNDS HAD TO BE RELEASED. THE PRESIDENT WAS VERY CLEAR WITH ME, HE ONLY RAISED ONE ISSUE AND THAT ISSUE ONLY AND THAT WAS ABOUT THE EUROPEANS NOT DOING ENOUGH. I DON’T DISAGREE WITH HIM ON THAT. WE WERE AT THE POINT WHERE WE HAD TO OBLIGATE THE FUNDS SO THEY CAN BE EFFECTIVE SO WE NEEDED TO GET THE MONEY GOING, BUT I THINK THE PRESIDENT WAS INTERESTED IN USING THE FUNDS AS LEVERAGE TO TRY TO GET THE EUROPEANS TO DO MORE.>>SO HERE’S THE CRUCIAL STEP LEFT OUT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT TIMELINE. ON THE 11th OF SEPTEMBER ROB PORTMAN CALLED THE PRESIDENT. LATER THAT DAY THE AID IS RELEASED. IT GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH INVESTIGATING JOE BIDEN. WHEN SUPPOSEDLY SERIOUS AND IMPARTIAL JOURNALISTS FAIL TO PROVIDE THOSE DETAILS BECAUSE THEY EXONERATE THE PRESIDENT ON THE QUID PRO QUO CHARGE, THEY ARE DELIBERATELY MISLEADING YOU. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL HAD IT RIGHT, THE CONVERSATION WAS LESS THAN PROMOTED BY THE PRESS. GOOD LUCK TO PERSUADE AMERICANS THIS IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE. ON TO THE SECOND CLAIM THAT THE PRESIDENT INVITED A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO INTERFERE IN OUR ELECTION. NOW, LET’S NOT BE NAI NOW, LET’S NOT BE NAÏVE. YOU THINK PRESIDENT TRUMP IS THE FIRST AMERICAN LEADER TO BRING DOMESTIC POLITICAL CONCERN INTO THE RELATIONSHIP OF ANOTHER COUNTRY? AT THE END OF THEIR FIRST MEETING BARACK OBAMA LEANED OVER TO MY OLD BOSS DAVID CAMERON LIKE A MOB BOSS TOLD HIM WHAT SIDE HE SHOULD BE ON IN THE 2008 ELECTION. IN 1992, THE BUSH CAMPAIGN ASKED THE BRITISH CONSERVATIVES FOR DIRT ON BILL CLINTON. THOSE ARE JUST TWO EXAMPLES I KNOW ABOUT PERSONALLY. EVEN THE NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD WHILE COMING OUT FOR IMPEACHMENT ADMITS TRUMP IS NOT ALONE IN THIS. HAVE OTHER PRESIDENTS CONDUCTED FOREIGN POLICY WITH REELECTION IN MIND? OF COURSE. MORE RECENTLY THE DEMOCRATS SEEM TO SPEND THEIR ENTIRE TIME TRYING TO GET DIRT FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS. LAST YEAR GROUP OF DEMOCRAT SENATORS ASKED TO UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL FOR DIRT ON TRUMP IN 2016 THE DEMOCRATS REPORTEDLY TRIED TO GET DIRT ON TRUMP FROM THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT ASKING FOR PAUL MANAFORT IT TO BE INVESTIGATED, AND OF COURSE, THE BIG ONE, HILLARY CLINTON PAYING BRITISH AND RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES FOR DIRT ON TRUMP. NOW, THERE’S NO DOUBT PRESIDENT TRUMP TALKED ABOUT INVESTIGATING JOE BIDEN WITH UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT. THE DEMOCRATS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT ARRESTING THEIR CASE ON THE WORDS I WOULD LIKE YOU TO DO US A FAVOR, AND HERE WE COME TO THE CENTRAL ASTONISHING BRAZEN DISHONESTY OF THE DEMOCRATS AND EVERY JOURNALIST WHO CLAIMS THERE’S SOMETHING HERE ON FOREIGN INTERFERENCE. LET’S READ TOGETHER THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE CALL. I WOULD LIKE YOU TO DO US A FAVOR BECAUSE OUR COUNTRY HAS BEEN THROUGH A LOT AND UKRAINE KNOWS A LOT ABOUT IT. I WOULD LIKE YOU TO FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENED WITH THIS WHOLE SITUATION WITH UKRAINE, CROWD STRIKE, THEY SAY UKRAINE HAS IT. THERE ARE THINGS THAT WENT ON, THE WHOLE SITUATION. WHEN HE ASKED FOR A FAVOR, HE’S NOT ASKING ABOUT BIDEN, HE WAS NOT ASKING FOR FUTURE FOREIGN MEDDLING, HE WAS ASKING ABOUT PAST FOREIGN MEDDLING. AGAIN, AS THE WALL STREET JOURNAL NOTED, THERE ISN’T NOTHING WRONG WITH ASKING A FOREIGN HEAD OF STATE TO INVESTIGATE MEDDLING IN U.S. ELECTIONS. LATER IN THE CALL, CONVERSATION TURNS TO RUDY GIULIANI AND ALLEGATIONS OF WRONGDOING. PRESIDENT TRUMP DOES INDEED ENCOURAGE THE UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT TO PURSUE THESE, BUT GUESS WHO BRINGS IT UP. NO, NOT PRESIDENT TRUMP, HE’S THE ONE THAT INSTIGATES THEIR BACK-AND-FORTH ABOUT THE BIDEN SITUATION BY BRINGING UP GIULIANI. YOU CAN ARGUE THE PRESIDENT LIKE TO BE WISER TO RESPOND BY SAYING YOU KNOW WHAT, THAT’S GETTING INTO POLITICAL PROBLEM AND WE SHOULDN’T TALK ABOUT IT, BUT THE IDEA THAT THIS CALL IN THE SO-CALLED WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS ABOUT IT IS EVIDENCE THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP ABUSED HIS OFFICE FOR PERSONAL GAIN CALLED THE WORLD LEADER TO ASK HIM TO GET DIRT ON HIS OPPONENT, MEDDLED IN OUR ELECTION AND USED A AMERICAN MILITARY AID IS A JOKE AND COMPLETE JOKE. NOW WE HAVE EVIDENCE THAT IT’S A JOKE. THE FACT THAT THE DEMOCRATS AND THEIR CO-CONSPIRATORS ARE ALREADY MOVING AWAY FROM IT IS A BASIS FOR IMPEACHMENT. REMEMBER HOW THEY DROPPED COLLUSION AND SWITCH TO OBSTRUCTION? IT’S HAPPENING AGAIN. THEY KNOW THERE’S NO CASE ON THE QUID PRO QUO SO GUESS WHAT, NOW IT’S COVER-UP THE ANTI- TRUMP BUREAUCRAT ACTIVISTS, WHISTLEBLOWER REVEALED THAT WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS PUT THE UKRAINE TRANSCRIPT IN THE COMPUTER SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR NATIONAL SECURITY SEEKERS NOT FOR DIPLOMATIC CAUSE. LIKE SHEEP, IT’S THE COVER-UP THAT GETS YOU, NOT THE CRIME. ARE THEY SERIOUS? FIRST AS WE’VE SHOWN YOU THERE WAS NO CRIME. SECOND DON’T THEY REMEMBER THAT SHOCKINGLY SOME OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S EARLY PHONE CALLS WITH WORLD LEADERS WERE LEAKED. WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE SURPRISED, BUT FINALLY, THE MOST OBVIOUS IDIOCY OF THE CLAIM, THE WHITE HOUSE PUBLISHED A CALL PROACTIVELY BEFORE HE SUBPOENAED HER LEGAL PROCESS THEY VOLUNTARILY PUBLISH THE WHOLE THING. SOME COVER-UP. IT’S INCREDIBLE TO ME THAT ANY SERIOUS PERSON COULD TAKE ANY OF THIS SERIOUSLY, AND YET WE SEE EVERY DEMOCRAT SPOUTING THIS OBVIOUS NONSENSE. ALMOST EVERY NEWS ANCHOR DOING IT. WE EVEN HEAR THAT IF THERE WAS A SECRET BALLOT AT LEAST 30 REPUBLICAN SENATORS WOULD VOTE TO CONVICT PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE. THERE’S ONLY ONE EXPLANATION, CLASS LOYALTY, RULING CLASS LOYALTY FOR 50 YEARS A RULING CLASS OF REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS, PERMANENT OFFICIALS IN THE GOVERNMENT YOUR ACCURACY WITH THEIR DONATIONS HAVE RUN THE WORLD AND THEIR INTEREST. IT WAS BASED ON GLOBALISM. THERE WERE TWO KEY COMPONENTS. FREE-TRADE AND OPEN BORDERS. GLOBALISM MADE THE RULING CLASS RICHER. IF YOU ARE OPERATING ON A GLOBAL NOT JUST NATIONAL SCALE YOU CAN GET MUCH BIGGER AND MAKE MUCH MORE MONEY IF YOU OPEN YOUR BORDERS YOU CAN IMPORT AS MANY NEW WORKERS AS YOU WANT AND PAY THE REST OF THEM SO YOUR PROFIT MARGINS ARE LARGER. IN 2016 AMERICA ELECTED A PRESIDENT WHO STOOD AGAINST ALL THAT AND STARTED TO TURN IT AROUND. THIS IS WHY THEY ARE DEFENDING JOE BIDEN SO FEROCIOUSLY. HE’S THE ABSOLUTE EPITOME OF THE CORRECT RULING CLASS. AS I SAID ON TWITTER LAST WEEK, THE RULING CLASS ACT ALL OUTRAGED ABOUT FOREIGN INTERFERENCE IN OUR DEMOCRACY THROUGH ELECTION MEDDLING. THAT’S JUST NOT RIGHT. THE RIGHT WAY TO DO IT IS TO CUT OUT THE MIDDLEMAN. DON’T WASTE TIME ON STUPID ELECTIONS, JUST HAVE THE FOREIGN COUNTRIES MEDDLED DIRECTLY IN OUR GOVERNMENT. FOREIGN GOVERNMENT INTERFERE IN OUR DEMOCRACY EVERY DAY IN WASHINGTON THROUGH ALL THE SWAMPY TECHNIQUES WE’VE SHOWN YOU OVER THE YEARS. HIRING LAWYERS AND LOBBYISTS, FUNDING THINK TANKS AND HAVING GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS RELATIVES DIRECTLY ON THEIR PAYROLL. WHAT TOTAL DISGUSTING HYPOCRITES THEY ARE. NANCY PELOSI TOOK MONEY FROM SHADY COMPANIES IN UKRAINE. CHUCK SCHUMER TOOK MONEY FROM SAUDI ARABIA AND MEXICAN GOVERNMENT. [INAUDIBLE] PRESIDENT TRUMP’S FORMER DEFENSE SECRETARY JAMES MATTIS NOW WORKS FOR THE SWAMPY : GROUP WHICH BOASTS ABOUT SHIPPING AMERICAN DEFENSE JOBS OVERSEAS AND SELLING AMERICAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND OF COURSE, JOE BIDEN, FORGET ABOUT THE UKRAINE CORRUPTION, THAT’S NOTHING. HE TOOK OVER A BILLION DOLLARS IN BRIBES FROM THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT. AMERICA’S NUMBER ONE ADVERSARY IN THE FORM OF PAYMENTS IN EXCHANGE FOR POLICY FAVORS. SO, SPARE US THE SANCTIMONIOUS ABOUT FOREIGN. [INAUDIBLE] YOU’VE BEEN SELLING AMERICA TO THE HIGHEST FORM BETTER FOR PERSONAL GAIN. THIS IS GLOBALISM IN ACTION. THIS IS WHAT AMERICA REJECTED IN 2016 AND THE RULING CLASS JUST CAN’T STAND IT. THERE’S ONE MORE ASPECT TO THIS. ON TOP OF THE ECONOMIC DEVASTATION THAT THEY BROUGHT TO SO MANY HEARTLAND COMMUNITIES, THERE IS A CULTURAL CONDESCENSION, ESPECIALLY ON THE LEFT WITH THEIR INTOLERANCE AND HATE AND WOKE MANIA. THE RULING CLASS LOOK DOWN THEIR NOSES AT THE VERY PEOPLE WHO ARE THE VICTIMS OF THEIR IDEA. THEY SNEER AT THEIR FACE, THE ESTABLISHMENT IS NOT POLICY-BASED, IT’S CLASS BASE. THEY THINK HE’S VULGAR. THEY MOCK HIM BECAUSE HE LIKES MCDONALD’S. THE POLICY, THE TURNAROUND ON JOBS AND ESPECIALLY CHINA, THEY MEAN NOTHING TO THEM. THEY JUST HATE THIS PRESIDENT. THEY ARE PART OF THE RULING CLASS. THEY ARE DESPERATE TO FIT IN AT WASHINGTON DINNER PARTIES. THEY CRAVE APPROVAL. THE CHALLENGE TO GLOBALISM, THE CLASS PREJUDICE, THAT’S

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *